Your post makes alot of sense. The one question I have is that the primary criticism -- albeit from rationalist/libertarian types -- I hear re: FDA is that they are overly conservative and too slow (lack of reciprocal approvals).
How would you suggest they think about the tradeoffs between efficiency and protection?
Action fallacy at its best. Or even Davy Hume's reason is the slave of passion.
Spot on, eh? Early, but correct. :)
Your post makes alot of sense. The one question I have is that the primary criticism -- albeit from rationalist/libertarian types -- I hear re: FDA is that they are overly conservative and too slow (lack of reciprocal approvals).
How would you suggest they think about the tradeoffs between efficiency and protection?